Untitled

edit

please explain why copywritten information on someone's ex-husband is necessary or relevant.

perhaps if they were both still married and had actually spoken to each other with the last 20 years, a little more information aside from the cursory mention might be nice, but definately not something that takes up two thirds of the article.

besides being a violation of Wikipedia policy, to blindly cut and paste useless information on someone no longer related in anyway is decidedly irrelevant and misrepresentative. 07:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)