Talk:Yeni Akit

Biased content

The first paragraph gives it away: POV content that has no significance and the truth of it is doubtful. Give us encyclopedic content, not some people’s biased ideas. 786wave (talk) 20:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Agree. This article is POV-pushing hatred. I suggest blanking or reducing to a one sentence stub. I followed a link here that was meant to be about an old newspaper with a similar name. If I had seen a blank page I would have known there was no useful information. I didn't learn anything about the modern newspaper other than that some Wikipedia editor disapproves of its politics. What is its circulation? Main coverage area (both subject matter and geography)? Publisher and editor? Obviously some people are subscribing. Who? Does it pick a segment of the population in competition with another daily, or does it dominate its market? Vox Sciurorum (talk) 18:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Owned by whom?

Who owns the paper? How come the motivated users who added all that POV and biased info did not add this info? Someone add it please. 786wave (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Uğurlu Gazetecilik Basın Yayın Matbaacılık Reklamcılık Limited Şirketi

I am not entirely sure if they are just printer of the newspaper or owner though Tkipsizad (talk) 17:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

I think the article is neutral enough

I have removed the part where it says its an AKP (Justice and Development Party) supporter and it having close ties with Erdogan. I think it is neutral enough since their hate of LGBT, jews and Armenians is neutral said.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsabent (talk • contribs)

Articles are written from a non-neutral point of view

Very-very unbalanced article as per wikipedia rules OriginalFixed (talk) 01:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)