Talk:Yesterday's Wine

Yesterday's Wine has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 14, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Country music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yesterday's Wine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Hi, sorry, but this entry is straight up WEIRD. sounds like creative writing turned encyclopedic gone wrong. love the album more than most anything though. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.117.120.24 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
"hadvast" seems to be a typo; I think it should be "vast", but that doesn't make sense, too.

Corrected.--GDuwenTell me! 15:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Is Ref 4 and 6 the references for the full "Concept" section? Can you do the same shortcut-formatting like in Phases and Stages?

I added two more references for the other two paragraphs. Refs now with shortcuts--GDuwenTell me! 15:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

ISBN check: ok
Dabsolver check: fixed 2 links
Checklinks check: ok
Reflinks check: -
On hold until you fix the issues.--♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 11:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pass another great article!--♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 17:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic