This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI assumed that the previously recorded "Qin" was a typo for "Jin", but I can't confirm which dynasty is being mentioned. Ardric47 00:55, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Page move
editThis page was recently moved to Yesü Hei (two words) with no discussion. None of the major sources for Genghis Khan (Ratchnevsky, Lister, Weatherford, Man, etc.), who are ipso facto the sources for his father, use a two-word name for the man, though there are some variations on the third consonant cluster (kh, g, gh, &c.). This page should remain here, at least, unless there is some discussion on consensus to move it. siafu (talk) 16:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Moved again, without discussion. WP:COMMONNAME clearly indicates that the most common name for the subject is the appropriate article title, which in this case would likely be Yesugei. siafu (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- Seconded. I have never seen his name spelt with two different words. Hell, I haven't seen it spelt as anything other than Yesugei (for example, the Cleaves translation of Secret History of the Mongols). I would recommend reversion to the original title. Benjitheijneb (talk) 19:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- I was unable to engage the editor who made the move in discussion, and it kept getting reverted. I don't have the time or energy to follow up on everything, so I just gave up on this one. By all means, move it back. siafu (talk) 21:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Requested Move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:47, 16 October 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Yesu Hei → Yesugei – or Yesukhei per WP:COMMONNAME. See discussion in previous section. siafu (talk) 00:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support: Current spelling is completely unusual. --RJFF (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Deletion
editWhat happened to the history before this year? Ardric47 (talk) 17:07, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Lead image
edithttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E4%B9%9F%E9%80%9F%E8%A9%B2.jpg
The image of Yesughei Baghatur, previously added to the article by 74.90.120.94, and described as "The baghatur Yesügei Borjigin as portrayed in a 14th-century Yuan era album", is fake. It is not hosted or even listed on the National Palace Museum's website. Image searches on Google and SauceNao show that it is only hosted on websites like Pinterest, Quora, Reddit, and WordPress. Not a single authoritative source hosts the image. Likewise, it is not found in Possessing the Past: Treasures from the National Palace Museum, Taipei by James C. Y. Watt and Wen Fong, which is probably the most comprehensive work available on the works hosted at the National Palace Museum. And, predictably, the image on Wikimedia has no source information.
The image should not be reposted unless someone can come up with verified source information that it is an an actual Yuan album portrait and not a fake. - Hunan201p (talk) 16:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)