Talk:Ying Wa College
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis starts off sounding like an advert. The history is very good. Needs to have a neutral point of view. Needs refs. Pictures are good. Welcome Victuallers 15:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I found this Chinese page [1] that talked about Church activities in China and the founding of this school was mentioned.
Rename
edit- It is better move the article to Ying Wa College reflecting the present usage. — HenryLi (Talk) 12:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
School hymn
editIn the Sheng Kung Hui Lam Woo Memorial Secondary School article, someone mentioned that its school hymn was the same as Ying Wah's. If this is confirmed, the School hymn template can be copied over from that page. Thanks, Ohconfucius 01:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Chinese
editWhy is there chinese explaination text? It should be english. This is english wikipedia not chinese wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gc1mak (talk • contribs) 14:11, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Requested move 14 January 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page as requested at this time, per the discussion below. Merge/split discussion can continue outside of the process for requested moves. Dekimasuよ! 21:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Ying Wa College → Anglo-Chinese College – Anglo-Chinese College (now Ying Wa College) is one of the existing earliest articles in English Wikipedia that it was original referring to the College founded in 1818 and dissolved in 1873. Although Ying Wa College (a secondary school now in Hong Kong) claims its origin is Anglo-Chinese College, there is a definite historical break between the Anglo-Chinese College (dissolved on 1873) and Ying Wa College (reestablished on 1914). Most of the academic researches about the Anglo-Chinese College only refer to the institution before 1873. (e.g. Waiting for China: the Anglo-Chinese College in Malacca by Brian Harrison [2] and Robert Morrison and the Protestant Plan for China by Christopher A. Daily [3], both published by HKU Press). Some historians have also challenged the historical connection between both. (as stated in Ying Wa Girls' School history [4], only available in Chinese.) Ux610283 (talk) 15:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. ToThAc (talk) 18:45, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. feminist (talk) 07:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry but I would say I do not see how "Ying Wa College" should be used per WP:COMMONNAME, given that "Ying Wa College is equivalent to Anglo-Chinese College" may be controversy. By the way, the name "Anglo-Chinese College" is also common on English Wikipedia. Articles including Liang Fa, James Legge, Raffles Institution, Wang Tao (19th century), Robert Morrison (missionary), Yuan Dehui, Samuel Dyer, William Milne (missionary), Wat Ngong, Malacca High School are all link to this article using
[[Ying Wa College|Anglo-Chinese College]]
. Ux610283 (talk) 09:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)- Compare Google Trends search interest, not even a blip for "anglo-chinese college". Same with Google Search results, many more results for "ying wa college" than "anglo-chinese college". Even the school website pretty obviously states "Ying Wa College". Clearly most people use "Ying Wa College" instead of "Anglo-Chinese College". How it is named on Wikipedia right now doesn't matter. feminist (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- No, what I mean is that Ying Wa College should not be considered as equivalent to Anglo-Chinese College. They should be considered as different entities. What I suggest is that move this page back to Anglo-Chinese College, and the content of Ying Wa College should be in another article. Ux610283 (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- You can split the article into Anglo-Chinese College and Ying Wa College per WP:CONSPLIT. --Antonytse (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- FYI, I would oppose such a split, but that's not what the RM process is concerned about. feminist (talk) 10:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- You can split the article into Anglo-Chinese College and Ying Wa College per WP:CONSPLIT. --Antonytse (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- No, what I mean is that Ying Wa College should not be considered as equivalent to Anglo-Chinese College. They should be considered as different entities. What I suggest is that move this page back to Anglo-Chinese College, and the content of Ying Wa College should be in another article. Ux610283 (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Compare Google Trends search interest, not even a blip for "anglo-chinese college". Same with Google Search results, many more results for "ying wa college" than "anglo-chinese college". Even the school website pretty obviously states "Ying Wa College". Clearly most people use "Ying Wa College" instead of "Anglo-Chinese College". How it is named on Wikipedia right now doesn't matter. feminist (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry but I would say I do not see how "Ying Wa College" should be used per WP:COMMONNAME, given that "Ying Wa College is equivalent to Anglo-Chinese College" may be controversy. By the way, the name "Anglo-Chinese College" is also common on English Wikipedia. Articles including Liang Fa, James Legge, Raffles Institution, Wang Tao (19th century), Robert Morrison (missionary), Yuan Dehui, Samuel Dyer, William Milne (missionary), Wat Ngong, Malacca High School are all link to this article using
- Oppose the rename; neutral on a split (which should be a separate proposal). power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.