Talk:Yoga Makaranda

Yoga Makaranda has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 15, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Yoga Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yoga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yoga, Hatha yoga, Yoga as exercise and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YogaWikipedia:WikiProject YogaTemplate:WikiProject YogaYoga articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

GA Review

Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yoga Makaranda/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 15:16, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

1. Prose ✓ Pass

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations ✓ Pass

7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass

Comments

1.

" And he noted that the asanas in the book are described" - It's a hot debate in some circles of English of whether or not sentences can start with and. It's probably best to just rephrase this so nobody takes offense.

Done.

"The bulk of the book (pages 51–151) is taken up with a description of 42 asanas." - Can you indicate which of the versions this page range is from?

Removed the parenthesis; the citation has the page range already, and the date (2006).

2.

Ref 7 appears to be a video, I believe there's a way to specifically point this out in the citations.

Cite media.

Ref 8 has the repost date associated with it, I think since you're citing the repost on the website instead of original text, it needs the date from the website.

Added.

En dashes in the page ranges in the secondary sources.

Done.

Do secondary refs 1 and 10 have locations for the publisher

Done.

Does ref 10 (the Kindle version) have its own ISBN? (I'm not sure if they give those to online versions or not)

Added, it seems to be unique to that version.

3.

4.

5.

6.

" The image is used only here, and is the only image in the article." - Rephrase this part of the Fair Use rationale. Both fair use rationales work fine, but this one isn't the only image in the article, or the only fair use image in the article. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the intention of the phrase some, but I think this needs a little tweak.

Updated the NFUR.

7.

Just a little bit of cleanup here, ought to quick fixes. Placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 16:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

That's all done! Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Chiswick Chap: - You seem to have accidentally undone most of your changes with this edit. Hog Farm (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not sure how that can have happened. Have merged the updates. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:49, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Promoting now

Add topic