Talk:York Vision
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Website out of date
editAnyone know why the york vision website is so out of date? It's not been updated this accademic year by the looks of things... -- Tomhab 11:56, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The last revert to the article on 29th July
editMuch of what was removed from the article in that revert does appear to be truew if my memory serves me corrctly, however, I do think the way it was written was not suitable. Also, even some of the bits which were true probably don't need to be incldued. Can someone with a better memory than me varify that the 'Lecturer: my child porn shame' stuff and the media awards stuff is all true? I know the paper won the Guardian aweard thing for at least 3 years in a row and there was at least one lecturer arrested over child pornography which I read about in the paper. Evil Eye 17:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Turns out you were right about the media awards stuff! Maragil (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:York Vision/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
|
Last edited at 20:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 11:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Undoing of revisions
editAs per WP:COI I note that I have undone the revisions throughout March referring to 'controversy'. Whilst factually accurate, it was very poorly written. Further, I note I am the author of the article which was referred to, and the person who did the research that the article was based off. I also believe the author themselves had a COI, as they identified themselves to me, but naturally will not identify them.