Talk:You're Still the One

Latest comment: 1 year ago by TenPoundHammer in topic GA Review
Good articleYou're Still the One has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 2, 2006Good article nomineeListed
November 18, 2006Good article reassessmentKept
April 23, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
September 9, 2023Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Musicnotes.com

edit

Going by Musicnotes.com to determine the key of a song is not a good idea as that's the key pianist transcribers prefer, vis Elton John at Dick James with a Beatles catalogue where they never played in Eb. Brett Alexander Hunter (talk) 03:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Um, Orleans song of similar title?

edit

Why no reference? - Darkhawk

I don't know, why is there no reference to this song from "Still the One"?? --Thankyoubaby 02:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Good Article

edit

I passed the article. mrholybrain 22:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article has been delisted, as it fails criterion 1 ("well written") — it does not conform to the Manual of Style. Specifically, see WP:MUSIC/TABLE for the proper layout of the indiscriminately collected information that makes up over a third of the article. --keepsleeping slack off! 16:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Well I'd say it stays as a Good Article and it looks like it's 2 to 1, so it will stay that way. --Thankyoubaby 03:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
As there seems to be some debate I've now taken this to Wikipedia:Good articles/Review. --Salix alba (talk) 12:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Clarity?

edit

while it was the first to be released to pop and international markets. Does this mean it was the first of her songs to be released to those markets? -Malkinann 21:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it does. --Thankyoubaby 07:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Steel solo

edit

Does anyone know if the steel guitar solo in this song was played backwards? It sure sounds like it. TenPoundHammer 11:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit

I've listed this article at good article review, where I've noted some concerns about this article. ShadowHalo 08:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA delisted

edit

This article was delisted per the now archived Good article review and the instructions at said archive. IvoShandor 11:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on You're Still the One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on You're Still the One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on You're Still the One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:You're Still the One/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 17:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@TenPoundHammer Hello! Thank you for the review. Regarding the song's performance on the Canadian charts, in the "Commercial performance" section there is information about the song's performance on the Canadian RPM Singles, Adult Contemporary and Country charts. Best regards, TabooMatters94 (talk) 20:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Good work so far. Just a couple minor things and this should pass.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    No issues spotted here. Made a couple minor tweaks. Added a {{Use Canadian English}} for good measure and fixed some {{cite AV media notes}} errors.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (inline citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    Spot-checked several newspapers.com sources and they all contained the proper information without any evidence of OR.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    I would recommend adding the song's performance on the Canadian charts to the "commercial performance" section, as Twain is Canadian.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    All images have proper alt tags as well.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Good work. Only addition should be the Canadian charts and then this is good to pass.