Talk:You Can't Read this Book

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Freedom of speech Low‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copying Guardian review

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Much of the "Digital revolution?" section of this article appears to be an almost verbatim copy of parts of this Guardian review with only partial attribution.--146.90.245.55 (talk) 03:03, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just found that another paragraph is taken verbatim from this Huffington Post review. Like the earlier example, there is only partial attribution, for part of it quotation marks aren't even used. It seems most of the content of this article is simply copy-pasted verbatim from reviews of the book but this is only made clear in some parts, which is also probably why the article is tagged with tone concerns. I'm going to be bold and remove most of it, it should go without saying it is also highly POV. The review section of this article is not really a NPOV overview of reviews of the book, but rather a highly POV review in itself, which merely draws on other reviews.--146.90.245.55 (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic