Talk:You Go to My Head (film)/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 18:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Will review for the GAN October 2020 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 18:58, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit
  • Wikilink romantic thriller and post-traumatic amnesia
  • "with review-aggregation websites Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic giving 67% and 69% positive reviews, respectively." - the percent symbol should be replaced by words per MOS:PERCENT

Synopsis

edit
  • "The woman struggles to come to grips with who she is," - understand who she is,

Production

edit
  • The wikiink for Delfine Bafort is not needed
  • "The actor Svetozar Cvetković was approached by co-producer Zoran Tasic a few weeks before principal photography began." - how many weeks exactly?
Unknown — the source says a few weeks. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "He was "very taken by the story"," - according to whom?
  • "with intimate scenes with Svetozar Cvetkovic," - his surname is only needed

Release

edit
  • "where it won Best Directing and Special Jury awards." - won the Best

Critical response

edit
  • "the film holds an approval rating of 67% based on nine reviews," - the % symbol should be spelt out per MOS:PERCENT; also Rotten Tomatoes currently says it is 60 percent not 67 percent
  • The Wrap is one word

Accolades

edit
  • The accolades table should include "scope="col"s in the columns

References

edit
  • Reference 3 is missing the publisher which should not be in the title
  • The publisher of Reference 8 has a stray comma at the end
  • Also the title in the same reference should not be italised
  • The authors in Refs 9 and 12 should be linked
  • Reference 11 is missing the work
  • "Arizona International Film Festival : You Go to mMy Head"" - the colons should not be spaced out and there is an extra m in the text in bold
  • Reference 18 is missing the date it was published

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 07:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply