Talk:Young at Heart (The X-Files)
 | Young at Heart (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | Young at Heart (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Young at Heart (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Plot
- "Barnett make taunting phone calls to Mulder" makes?
- Fixed. GRAPPLE X 19:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Production
- "California magazine" Should this be wikilinked?
- It just redirects to the article for University of California, Berkeley, not sure if that's worth the link since there's no content about the magazine there. GRAPPLE X 19:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- Brodcast/rec
"Executive Producer Robert Goodwin considered the episode one of the most emotional episodes of the first season". Why was this?
- Fixed. Found out the reason and added some relevant information about it into the production section as well. GRAPPLE X 19:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:42, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Has there been confirmation by anyone, ever, that Barnett put a bomb in the locker?
editI never even considered that when watching the episode because it makes no sense. Bombs don't tick. The implication of the ticking (if you think it was a bomb) would be that it was a time bomb - which, again, would make no sense, if the bomb is there as some kind of precaution.
The ticking was meant to represent a metaphorical time bomb - the research, that was hiding there in the locker awaiting its eventual discovery. The VO narration confirms this, talking about Barnett from beyond the grave and so on. Or maybe I watched it wrong, I dunno. But the suggestion that it's a literal bomb in there seems ludicrous to me, given we hear a distinct ticking sound and the kind of bomb associated (incorrectly) with ticking in pop culture wouldn't make sense for that purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:D:C600:750:2144:1B32:2E79:EE39 (talk) 18:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)