Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?

Wetman

edit

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 09:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Your Arsenal/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
 Y All the start class criteria

 Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
 Y At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
 Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
 Y Categorisation at least by artist and year
 Y A casual reader should learn something about the album. Cavie78 (talk) 15:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article requirements:
 Y Start: reasonably complete infobox; lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization by at least artist and year.

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment".

Last edited at 15:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 11:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)