Talk:Yuen Pau Woo

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 206.45.2.52 in topic Light on citations

Untitled

edit

copy paste of http://www.yesatyale.org/asia/plenary1.html http://www.asiapacific.ca/2525 http://www.canadianbusinessschools.com/cms/templates/default.aspx?a=311&z=9 http://www.apebc.ca/resources/APEBC%20Speaker%20Event%20and%20AGM%20-%20July%2015,%202009.pdf

revised to avoid problem. I don't think the material was copy right because it just lists his positions, which are just facts with no embellishment, but it's different now nonetheless.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Yuen Pau Woo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:36, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yuen Pau Woo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Light on citations

edit

The article, as it stands, contains two links to what essentially constitute opinion pieces from National Post, who is already a fairly questionable source (does not regularly publish retractions, well-known political bias including editorial endorsement of parties, majority foreign ownership), as well as a one link to Global who have already been sued for allegedly publishing falsehoods with respect to the broader issue of Chinese interference. That appears to be the sum total of secondary sources in the article, the remainder are primary sources. Therefore I have added several tags to this article: more citations needed, NPOV, as well as original research. If the article relies mostly on primary sources, then it is original research. And given the issues with the few secondaries provided, I would like to see more verifiable citations in substantiation of the issues around Woo. I find the flurry of activity on a number of interconnected Wiki pages about Chinese-Canadians to be concerning, to say the least. 206.45.2.52 (talk) 19:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply