This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Over 4 years later and the question of whether this should be here or not is probably still valid. Having said that, the article's in much better shape than it was in September 2017. EdGl did some major cleanup in January 2021 and I've just done some additional cleanup. It no longer reads as an ad, it's in compliance with layout guidelines, it has inline references and better sources. So, wouldn't meet WP:G11 or WP:A7 for speedy deletion IMO. However, it's still an orphan and a solid case could be made for WP:PROD based on failure to meet WP:CORPDEPTH at least, given that so far there's a pretty limited number of reliable sources. As the article stands today, I wouldn't oppose deletion but I'm not convinced enough that it's necessary to propose it myself but I have tagged it for notability. DatraxMada (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply