This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This page seems to be essentially be a copyright violation of the users web site. Possibly he will give permission, but it none the less is excessive detail, and improper tone. I could delete it entitely as copyvio, but since he is undoubtedly notable, I have instead stubbified it to the essentials to show notability. DGG (talk) 00:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Something is not quite right here as your last edit does not give a stubbified version but instead restores the previous excessively long version of Ozricone. Nsk92 (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article needs cleanup. Several of the claims for notabiloity are really very minor: for instance, referee for journals, NSF, NIH and such. An Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship is a postdoctoral fellowship that does not confer notability according to WP:ACADEMIC, hardly necessary to mention it. The AvH Foundation is a Foundation, as far as I know you cannot be a member of that (I am familiar with AvH, being a former "Stipendiat" myself). Being a member of a Society is nothing noteworthy. The list of publications in the article is excessive. The amount of funding is nice, but again nothing that would confer notability. The number of citations mentioned is rather high, if correct, this would seem to confer notability for this person, so I am not taking this to AfD. The only "source" for the article is his homepage (some parts copied almost literally, but perhaps just changed enough to escape WP:COPYVIO), more sources are urgently needed. I will tag the article for the above problems. Something that is less clear is the possibility of WP:COI. The page was created by Ozricone, an WP:SPA who has edited only this article. The photo of Lvov is marked "own work", so at the very least Ozricone is someone close to the subject of the article or perhaps even the subject himself. --Crusio (talk) 10:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
