Talk:ZALA Lancet

some english svp

latest (early nov'22) add-ons are definitely not to even most basic standards. how this is ever allowed to stand? 46.138.61.78 (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

4 november

Can someone say why Telegram info and blogs are deleted? Its ok if they providing they view on the war like thinking Who Will win or etc. Yes, then its not official info,and you cant include It in wiki. But footage? Footage is footage, we clesrly see M777 and other stuff, there no gore and its not computer graphic. Stop deleting It. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1FA0:8652:1129:5981:C95F:FDC6:1705 (talk) 16:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Now its fine

I guess its fine. All links given is from a real war journalists(voenkors), so It reliable. Also please dont add such sources as TASS Thobelex (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

They are anything but reliable. Just propaganda outlets. These war "journalists", the Russian MoD and TASS are all unreliable, so please stop using them as sources. Thanks in advance. BilletsMauves^€500 08:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

"Please don't use the propaganda i don't like, just use the propaganda i agree with." 81.79.103.251 (talk) 14:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

I would call the Russian MoD an appropriate primary source when used correctly with attribution. Something to the effect of "The MoD released a press statement claiming increased production numbers of the Lancet-3. This has/has not been verified by independent sources.", for example. As long as you're making it clear that this is a claim they are making and not an independently verified statement of fact, that should be okay. I would recommend sticking to independent secondary sources for anything that has no real dispute surrounding it (we can all reasonably agree on its wingspan, for instance), that is the standard. RocketsFallOnRocketFalls (talk) 21:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Knows anybody the dimensions?

Knows anybody informations about the wingspan, fuselage diameter or length and can add this? 2003:6:3F8:EF35:8188:792A:866B:4106 (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

It's the same issue which brought me to the talk page. The article has takeoff weight, payload, "bigger", "smaller". However, that doesn't mean much too many readers. It's a good article with plenty of information, but just how big is this thing? Sparrow-size, vulture-size, man-size, single engine plane size? Can one soldier carry it or does it require a lorry? Humpster (talk) 07:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)