Talk:Zach Parise/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by ThinkBlue in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the Professional section, just a suggestion, "Parise was chosen to play in the NHL YoungStars Game during the All-Star weekend, where he scored two goals and four assists, and as a result, he was named the game's MVP for his efforts", again, just a suggestion, cause somehow those two sentences should be merged together. Same section, "After the season, Parise was chosen as one of three nominees for the Lady Byng Memorial Trophy[17]" is a period missing? In the International section, "Next year" ---> "The following year".
- Check.
- In the Professional section, just a suggestion, "Parise was chosen to play in the NHL YoungStars Game during the All-Star weekend, where he scored two goals and four assists, and as a result, he was named the game's MVP for his efforts", again, just a suggestion, cause somehow those two sentences should be merged together. Same section, "After the season, Parise was chosen as one of three nominees for the Lady Byng Memorial Trophy[17]" is a period missing? In the International section, "Next year" ---> "The following year".
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Throughout the article, please link "Eastern Conference", "Easton Hockey", and "Easton" to their correspondence articles, as at the moment they stand out as disambiguations. In the Professional section, "On November 30, 2007 of that season" ---> "On November 30, 2007, of that season", commas after dates, if using MDY. Question: In the International section, shouldn't there be a consistency between "Under-18 level" and "under-20 level", which I mean with the capitalization of "U".
- Check.
- Throughout the article, please link "Eastern Conference", "Easton Hockey", and "Easton" to their correspondence articles, as at the moment they stand out as disambiguations. In the Professional section, "On November 30, 2007 of that season" ---> "On November 30, 2007, of that season", commas after dates, if using MDY. Question: In the International section, shouldn't there be a consistency between "Under-18 level" and "under-20 level", which I mean with the capitalization of "U".
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- "Sports Illustrated", "USA Today", "Calgary Herald", "The Star-Ledger", "Montreal Gazette", "Edmonton Journal", and "New York Daily News" need to be in the "work" format of the ref, since they are newspaper publications. Reference 19 has a different url link path, so you might want to update that.
- Check.
- "Sports Illustrated", "USA Today", "Calgary Herald", "The Star-Ledger", "Montreal Gazette", "Edmonton Journal", and "New York Daily News" need to be in the "work" format of the ref, since they are newspaper publications. Reference 19 has a different url link path, so you might want to update that.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Not that good.
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think I got pretty much everything there, I don't think there is anything to do about the stability / vandalism that popped up last night, but if I can do anything more in that respect, please let me know. Thanks for the help improving the article. Canada Hky (talk) 18:48, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Everything checks out. Thank you to Canada Hky for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)