Talk:Zagreb Resolution

Zagreb Resolution has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 17, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zagreb Resolution article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yugoslavia Low‑importance

	Zagreb Resolution is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zagreb Resolution/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I will be taking a look at this! — Ghost River 16:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )

3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lede

"as continuation of" → "as a continuation of"
"the conference held in Zagreb on 2–3 March" → "the Zagreb conference that March."

Background

Missing closing en dash after "and the Muslim Slavs (Bosniaks)"
There's a lot going on in this clause and I'm wondering if there would be some way to split it: objections of Croat political leaders to division of the proposed Triune Kingdom to Croatia-Slavonia and the Kingdom of Dalmatia assigned to the Hungarian-dominated Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen and Cisleithania respectively.
"~~the~~ Russia sued for peace"
"May of 1917" → "May 1917" per MOS:BADDATE
Comma after "in the Austrian Imperial Council"

Zagreb conference

"There were 43 people attending the conference," → "The conference boasted 43 attendees"
"Slovenes, Croats and Serbs is unified" → "Slovenes, Croats and Serbs are unified"
No comma needed after "The first point of the resolution"
"and was used in the Niš Declaration."
"historcally" → "historically"

Aftermath

17 August the Slovene National Council (Narodni svet) in Ljubljana on 17 August. muddled syntax
"The main challenges for the preparatory committee was to obtain cooperation of the HSK which refused to cooperate, convince that the project was directed against the HSK." → "The main challenge for the preparatory committee was to obtain cooperation from the HSK, who were convinced that the project was directed against them."
"declared severing" → "declared the severance"
"and joining of the State" → "and joined the State"

References

Good

General comments

Map and photos are properly licensed and relevant
No stability concerns in the revision history
Earwig score looks good at 9.1%

All minor prose things. Putting on hold for now, and feel free to ping me with questions! — Ghost River 17:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking time to review this nomination. I have reviewed and implemented your suggestions. I have also edited the sentence containing repeated date (on establishment of the Narodni svet) and broken up the confusingly long sentence in the Background section you pointed out. Could you please have another look at those edits? Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Everything looks good now; happy to pass! — Ghost River 16:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Missing cites

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article cites "Matijević 2008", but such sources cannot be fined in the bibliography. --Governor Sheng (talk) 11:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguating suffix was missing in a cite parameter. Good catch, thanks.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic