Talk:Zangezur corridor
Latest comment: 9 months ago by 88.212.181.21 in topic Needs more on Iran point of view
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zangezur corridor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 May 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Needs more on Iran point of view
editFor example I don't understand how it would cut off Iran from Armenia as that route could go by tunnel or bridge over or under such a corridor. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Because to date there has been no official mention of a tunnel or bridge? 88.212.181.21 (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever the means of bypass, IR's point of view is quite simple - unhindered access between AZ and Nakhchivan via AM would rob it of the leverage it currently holds over AZ, ie AZ has no choice but to use Iranian territory for access.
- Of course, if left with no choice IR would prefer a form of transport which does not run the risk of being used by TR/AZ as a means of blocking trade between AM and IR, but it opposes unhindered access of any kind.
- I'm surprised there's no mention of Iran in this article. They are a focal point in this ongoing problem. 88.212.181.21 (talk) 20:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)