Talk:Zaslin Active Protection System

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Ukraine Low‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

questionable sentence

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This "However, it will not shield against hollow-charge artillery shells or armor-piercing sub-caliber shells which have thicker walls than grenades or TRG projectiles." lacks a source and sounds nonsensical. There are practically no hollow-charge artillery shells. The very few that exist would not be relevant. Maybe hollow charge (shaped charge) tank gun shots were meant. But tit's generally unlikely that thick walls are the issue (as shaped charge ammunitions hardly ever have thick shell walls around the shaped charge. The issue might rather be the velocity of around 900 m/s that might leave too little time to react (and affect) for the system. 37.120.49.149 (talk) 16:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic