Talk:Zee News

Proposed merge with Zee Business

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was do not merge into Zee News. -- 76.235.248.47 (talk) 08:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

---

No meaningful independent content [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 18:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Actually, I would think that there's enough information present for Zee Business to have its own article. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 04:08, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Zee News. -- 76.235.248.47 (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

---

I propose that Zee Entertainment Enterprises#Zee News Ltd be merged into Zee News. I think that the content in the Zee News Ltd section belongs in the Zee News article, NOT in the Zee Entertainment Enterprises article.. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 06:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lead section

As per guidelines for the lead section, The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic. Further, It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies so please, do not remove the controversies from the lead. --Rahulparasor (talk) 08:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

A politically motivated article

This article, looks like, was not written to talk about the ZEE NEWS channel as such but only to point out writer's / Author's point of view on one incident and another incident has been inserted / added to create an image that he/she wants to propogate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.227.97.20 (talk) 09:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

You are welcome to find well-sourced positive information and add it. Here is a start. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:43, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 September 2020

My request is a paragraph to be added under Controversies section. SUdhir Chowdhary, the senior editor of this Indian TV News channel was booked by police in May 2020. Sources: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/kerala-police-books-zee-news-editor-sudhir-chaudhary-6401670/, https://scroll.in/latest/961349/kerala-police-files-fir-against-zee-anchor-sudhir-chaudhary-for-offending-muslims, https://www.firstpost.com/india/kerala-police-files-fir-against-zee-news-editor-sudhir-chaudhary-for-broadcasting-jihad-flowchart-offending-sentiments-of-muslims-8351041.html, https://www.thequint.com/news/india/zee-news-sudhir-chaudhary-booked-by-kerala-police-for-jihad-chart-episode, https://www.huffingtonpost.in/entry/kerala-police-fir-against-sudhir-chaudhary-of-zee-news_in_5eb5249fc5b62d0addad1ea6 176.203.188.216 (talk) 08:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

 Not done. It's clear what changes you want to make. One sentence stating someone was arrested without any context doesn't offer enough information to warrant inclusion, nor is it clear how it's a "controversy". Also see WP:BLPCRIME, which may or may not apply here. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2020

My request is for a new controversy to be added. "On the night of the 11th of March, a daily program called DNA (short for Daily News and Analysis) was hosted by senior editor of the channel, Sudhir Chaudhary. On 7 May, Kerala police booked him under non-bailable sections and arrested him. He was later freed. Sources: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/kerala-police-books-zee-news-editor-sudhir-chaudhary-6401670/, https://scroll.in/latest/961349/kerala-police-files-fir-against-zee-anchor-sudhir-chaudhary-for-offending-muslims, https://www.firstpost.com/india/kerala-police-files-fir-against-zee-news-editor-sudhir-chaudhary-for-broadcasting-jihad-flowchart-offending-sentiments-of-muslims-8351041.html, https://www.thequint.com/news/india/zee-news-sudhir-chaudhary-booked-by-kerala-police-for-jihad-chart-episode, https://www.huffingtonpost.in/entry/kerala-police-fir-against-sudhir-chaudhary-of-zee-news_in_5eb5249fc5b62d0addad1ea6 176.203.188.216 (talk) 12:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

 Not done. Your request has already been declined once, this is not a controversy and even if it was it wouldn't belong here anyway. Prolix 💬 12:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Violation of WP:CSECTION

The WP:CSECTION states "create a section entitled "Public image" or "Public profile", and include all related information – positive and negative – within that section" The content section in this article is basically a controversy section with a name of "Content" and only holds the "controversies" that this channel has had. Definitely not a unbiased representation of what "Content" this channel produces. >>> Extorc.talk(); 08:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Feel free to expand the "Content" section with additional coverage of Zee News's other content. WP:CSECTION does not justify the removal of negative coverage; it only recommends for negative coverage to be under a section heading that can accommodate both negative and positive aspects of the article subject (such as "Content"). "Public image" and "Public profile" are recommendations for biographies. — Newslinger talk 08:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Where to add this news in this Wiki page?

This https://scroll.in/latest/1026212/there-was-an-agenda-zee-news-directed-to-take-down-video-on-muslim-population is a news about News Broadcasting and Digital Standards Authority chairperson saying that the Zee News conducted a debate without any objective data and with an agenda.

Can it be added to the Zee News wikipedia page?

Where should I add this point?

(Libreravi (talk) 11:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC))

Since when have 'Opinion Pieces' been considered as legitimate references?

The reference 4 is referring to various opinion pieces. These are personal opinions and not free from bias and hence, not authentic. Besides this, referring the content from National Herald is another fallacy as this media is run by Indian National Congress, the main opposition party in India. 174.91.9.67 (talk) 03:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Opinion pieces can be used as sources, but would need to be attributed. See WP:RSOPINION. Ravensfire (talk) 18:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)