Talk:Zeiss (comics)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zeiss (comics) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 November 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 18 November 2020. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Zeissbatman.gif
editImage:Zeissbatman.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:Zeissbatman2.jpg
editImage:Zeissbatman2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
The Dark Knight Sequel
editI wouldnt be suprised if Zeiss and possibly deadshot were the villians in the next batman because Zeiss in particular ties-in to being a bodyguard for the mob and a sworn enemy of batman it would also allow the directors and writers to introduce new mob characters and add depth to them. Also because christopher nolan specifically said he wanted to use villians that have never been portrayed in any of the batman movies but also try to explore more in numbers of villians than the previous 2 movies wich leads me to beleive that there will be a handful of villians —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redskies08 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
C-Class rated for Comics Project
editAs this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)