Talk:Zelimkhan Khangoshvili
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zelimkhan Khangoshvili article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Who is behind the assassination?
editI do not want to contribute too much to "speculation" per se; however had, this is somewhat similar to an execution occurring in Austria some years ago (in 2009). See wikipedia here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umar_Israilov#Biography_and_murder
See also:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-13621483
I have no insight into the Khangoshvili situation, but I wanted to mention the above on the talk page in the event someone can connect qualified information; personally I am absolutely sure about the claims made against Ramzan Kadyrov. It would be interesting to see whether Kaydrov is somehow connected to the death of Khangoshvili. (I am just about absolutely certain that Kadyrow was involved in the murder of Israilov; the local courts also verified this, as you can read up on the wikipedia article about that incident.) 2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 15:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
RPP?
editIP User restored edits that in part cleaned up broken English existing edits. The IP User address locates to Darmstadt, Germany. Should this article receive page protection? Activist (talk) 21:36, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Easter Egg
edit@Smeagol 17: I recently changed "large prisoner exchange" to "2024 Russian prisoner exchange" to make it clearer where the link is leading (see WP:EGG). Why did you change it back? Nuretok (talk) 12:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Because the year is obvious from context. Smeagol 17 (talk) 13:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that the year is obvious, but in the current article it is unclear where the link is leading from the text alone. Sadly I have no idea how to better phrase it. Nuretok (talk) 14:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)