Hi @Joy:, you noticed the problem - it was my predicament in the moment when I tried to chose the best title (I was extremely reluctant to name this page the way I eventually chose), and you can see from the text that it deals mostly with a matter of particular feudal political-territorial organization of the medieval Bosnian state. So, yes, I agree, there is a page or two with redirects talking about more, but mostly less, about what appears to be fundamentally same thing - Land (administrative unit), Zemlya, Zemlia, also few disambiguation pages (Zemlya/Zemlja which seem to me little confusing).
In essence I agree with the merger, but not with this page removal (deletion) - I think some parts of this text should be used for expansion of the articles Land (administrative unit), but with a caution, because, just like this one, Land article too talks about very narrow subject matter; it takes on Polish and Ruthenian organization (see also Template:Polish terms for administrative divisions with entire Polish history on the topic, so I have a feeling someone created Zemlia→Land for the purpose of creating series to encompass entire topic of Polish political-territorial organization history), which is quite different from subject matter described in Zemlja, in terms of both period and substance-scope (where as Balkan organization was set in early and high Middle Ages with some remnants in late MA in Bosnia, Polish organization wasn't just medieval, it was used until 20th century with some overlaps in terminology and substance but mostly different administrative system of management and feudal and post feudal distribution).
At this point I would go with a change of title here to something that will more appropriately describe its content, which is (and should be with additional expansion on the topic) Political-territorial organization of the medieval Bosnian state (probably something shorter), with description of all other units in feudal distribution and governing scheme in medieval Bosnian state (which was/is my intention in the near future; I used just one book as a source here, we have a few more on the topic).--౪ Santa ౪99° 17:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
