Talk:Zennor Head/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 20:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

I'll be glad to take this review. I'll do a close readthrough of the article's text today or tomorrow, noting any initial problems, followed by the criteria checklist. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Initial readthrough

• The lead section needs work to meet WP:LEAD; this section should summarize all the sections that follow (including etymology and history), and contain no important information not in those sections. -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:15, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

• "it is flanked by two coves, Pendour and Porthzennor" -- does the "it" here refer to the village of Zennor or the promontory? -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

• The headland, I have corrected this.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 20:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is clear and accurate; spotchecks of available sources show no copyright issues.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images are properly tagged
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Images are appropriate and captioned
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass-- thanks for your work on this one!