This draft has been deleted multiple times due to being a blatant hoax (WP:G3), and due to this simply being nothing more than a TikTok trend, this is definitely not relevant and encyclopedic enough (the lack of credible sources shows this) to have its own Wikipedia article about it. Although Goncharov is a similar incident which has its own article, it seems to be much more defined and 'widespread' as a fictional movie. This is nothing more than a TikTok trend to promote the creator's music. If this doesn't again fail G3, it definitely fails WP:GNG and likely other regulations. B3251 (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Yup. There is no possibility of an article being accepted without substantially more coverage. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Unlike all the other drafts that have been created in relation to this, this one actually mentions it's a hoax, so that should probably disqualify it from G3. But yes, notability seems to remain an issue. I find it hard to believe this will have much lasting significance. These trends happen all the time, and they don't all result in articles. The only thing that is different about this one is that it involves some kind of purported fact that people want to spread, and they're spreading it here. —PlanetJuice (talk • contribs) 00:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Although that is true, the only sources that are (and can only be) used are either the TikTok themselves (not really an encyclopedically usable source) as well as less-reliable sources that cover these types of trends all the time, nothing that indicates sustainable significance whatsoever so chances are it'll fail GNG. B3251 (talk) 01:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
