Talk:Zermelo's theorem (game theory)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by LithiumFlash in topic This article has wrong information
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Material from Well-ordering theorem was split to Zermelo's theorem (game theory) on 16:58, 11 November 2009 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Well-ordering theorem. |
Split from Well-ordering theorem. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Possible Copying
editThe text on this page is very similar to the one in this reference [[1]] and may be a copyright violation. Also it contains non attributed opinions such as "Worst of all is the claim by M.A. Dimand and R.W. Dimand..." Dangling Reference (talk) 23:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
This article has wrong information
editThe main external reference is a paper that essentially explains why everything claimed on this wikipedia page is wrong!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.0.251 (talk) 11:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- I agree that the formal definition in the article was not supported by key references, so I removed it.—LithiumFlash (talk) 21:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)