Talk:Zero-point energy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zero-point energy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bell Labs show Casimir force on nano machine
edithttp://www.trnmag.com/Stories/021401/Quantum_effect_moves_machine_021401.html
A very interesting article about the work Bell Labs has been doing to look into the potential problems of "Nano bots" due to zero-point energy.
Don't forget to Spellcheck
editThe header "Fondational Physics" does not do wonders for your credibility. Use your spell-checker!
Adopting New Views as a Key For New Findings
editDon't use talk pages for advertising.
Articles in the press?
editThis article has a whole section entitled "Articles in the press". Why? Johnjbarton (talk) 15:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative theories
editThe section on "Alternative theories" has two paragraphs. The first one discusses alternative analysis and the second paragraph refutes it. The second paragraph misconstrues Jaffe. Jaffe is saying that vacuum fluctuations are needed by QED, but they are not real. His last sentence:
- Still, no known phenomenon, including the Casimir effect, demonstrates that zero point energies are “real”.