Talk:Zeus Street Greek
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Sirfurboy in topic Source assessment
Source assessment
editI have added a notability banner. This is my assessment of the sources used on the article to date. Note that the page must meet WP:NCORP as it is about a company. Multiple sources are required that meet WP:SIRS and the coverage of the company in each source should meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Sou
Source | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Pass/Fail | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Broadsheet [1] | A write up about the emergence of the outfit. Does not show lasting interest and neither does this meet WP:CORPDEPTH. It is a kind of routine coverage any such company might expect in papers centring on their locality of interest. | |||||
The Australian[2] | Source does not resolve to an article. | |||||
Daily Telegraph Australia 1. [3] and 2. https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/manly-daily/review-zeus-greek-street-opens-10th-restaurant-in-balgowlah/news-story/14772bbc59f3376333bb366c60f963a2 | Multiple articles from the same source are counted as a single source. These articles constitute news reporting and are primary, They do not contain significant coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. | |||||
Hospitality Magazine [4] | Nothing at WP:CORPDEPTH. This is just news of a new restaurant opening. Likely off a press release. | |||||
Zeus Street Greek [5] | The company's own site. | |||||
Total qualifying sources | 0 | There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements
|