Talk:Zhang Boxing (Qing dynasty)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BorgQueen (talk) 03:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Qing dynasty scholar-official Zhang Boxing was accused of dereliction of duty for reading on the job? Source: Kent, R. Guy (2010). Qing Governors and Their Provinces: The Evolution of Territorial Administration in China, 1644-1796. University of Washington Press. pp. 248–260
  • Reviewed:

Created by Keeper of the Queen's Corgis (talk). Self-nominated at 03:38, 8 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Zhang Boxing (Qing dynasty); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

•  Reviewing... RV (talk) 07:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

General eligibility:

• New enough: - no
• Long enough: - no
• Other problems: - no

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:

QPQ:

Overall: @Keeper of the Queen's Corgis: Four basic criteria are used to determine whether a nomination is eligible for DYK. This article has an insufficient citation tag. For DYK purposes, an article is considered new if, within the last seven days, the article has been created in mainspace from a redlink or redirect; expanded at least fivefold in terms of its prose portion. This article was created on January 24, 2023, and it has not been expanded 5x or promoted to a good article within the past 10 days (15 days), clearly disqualifying it from passing the DYK criteria. Henceforth, it is disapproved, better luck next time. Thanks for your contribution and attempt. RV (talk) 08:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)