Talk:Zhou Man

Latest comment: 16 years ago by 130.111.88.173 in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit

Shouldn't there be a notification that the cited reference is a controversial book in itself? -anon

I agree. This article is basically taken from one source, Gavin Menzies contraversial book, 1421. The article deperately needs improving so as to take into account other sources on the life and deeds of Zhou Man. Dumbo1

The additions made by IP Address 157.181.178.146 should be reviewed as the spelling of some of the statements is poor, one critical statement is not cited, and then a major conclusion is made from that statement. Based on the dubious nature of several of the changes I recommend all the changes be reviewed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.111.88.173 (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply