Talk:Zi Corporation
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Egil in topic Nomination for deletion
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zi Corporation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 26 December 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Potential additional controversies
editA case where I did not find good enough referrences:
- It has been claimed that a key patent contained under the Jiejing Licenses was questionable. Eric Chappell claimed rights to it, but a 1996 UK court decision https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/449553/o16596.pdf gave the rights to Ron Thomas and Helmut Stohr (GB Patent no. 2238414 B, https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2238414 https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO1990002992). It is claimed Thomas and Stohr then sold the patent to Tegic, which was then used in the 2002 court case, against Zi.
Nomination for deletion
editA request to delete the article was withdrawn after changes were made to the article, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zi_Corporation. -- Egil (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)