Talk:Zion Square

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zion Square/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MusikAnimal (talk · contribs) 03:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this article. I'm a city type of guy so this should be fun. — MusikAnimal ^talk 03:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citations to reliable sources:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Concerns

History

• Jewish Colonization Association – let's link this
  •  Done Yoninah (talk)
• I am amazed that all of the "largest demonstrations" were reportedly 100,000 or near that in size. That be so, perhaps we could reword the sentence to something like: The largest demonstrations in the square included a May 2000 protest decrying the handover of Arab settlements adjacent to the Mount of Olives, a November 2000 protest against Ehud Barak's "policy of restraint" at the beginning of the Second Intifada, and a 2006 protest against the policies of acting prime minister Ehud Olmert, all of which drew around an estimated 100,000 people.
  •  Done Thanks, that's nice. Yoninah (talk)
• Under "Terrorist attacks": consider linking incendiary device. I wouldn't quite call it a common term and the concept I found interesting.
  •  Done Yoninah (talk)
• On July 4, 1975, ... killing 15 and wounding 77 – I found that the second provided reference (haaretz.com) supported all the claims in this sentence. The print source contains a broken link to Google Books. Up to you whether you want to ditch that source altogether, but if not you should remove or repair the link.
  •  Done I removed all the dead links here and elsewhere. Yoninah (talk)
• Last sentence under "Terrorist attacks", The Jerusalem Post source link is dead. Again, the other two references seem to support the sentence, as far as I can tell.
  •  Done Yoninah (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Landmarks

• Last sentence first paragraph: We should link "Old City"
  •  Done Yoninah (talk)

This article was an excellent read. Beautiful, flowing prose, to say the least! I have zero doubt this will be a good article. Let me know what you think of the above concerns and we'll move forward with the promotion. — MusikAnimal ^talk 04:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you for taking the time to review it, and for your suggestions to improve it. Yoninah (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Y Great work! This nomination has passed. Congrats! — MusikAnimal ^talk 22:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)