Talk:Zoe Sugg/Archive 1

Archive 1

Semi-protected edit request on 30 September 2014

Please add birthdate of March 28th, 1990 as confirmed on her blog in several locations (example: http://www.zoella.co.uk/2011/03/my-21st-birthday.html) 173.230.166.149 (talk) 17:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

It's a self-published source, but I feel like a birthdate will typically trace back to that. I'm okay with adding it; are there any objections to including it? —C.Fred (talk) 17:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

sounds fair enough Cannolis (talk) 20:19, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Per WP:DOB: "Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object." - the dob has not been mentioned by any reliable sources but I'd say that the second part is true in this instance. Are there any mentions by Zoe which contradict the 28th date? Nikthestunned 08:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Done per lag of objection Cannolis (talk) 21:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2014

Consider adding that she was Mind's first digital ambassador in October 2014. With Mind's support, she launched the initiative "#DontPanicButton," which raises awareness for young people who suffer from anxiety and panic attacks by encouraging people to wear red buttons, traditionally a sign of panic, as a sign of solidarity and positivity. (She announces her partnership in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRW9XBiGPdw&list=UUrUbqTCagwsaP2Fmr0p1TsA) (Mind's press release can be found here: http://www.mind.org.uk/news-campaigns/news/zoella-becomes-first-digital-ambassador-for-mind/#.VGV7JJPF800) Krobin31 (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)krobin31

Has this gotten coverage in reliable secondary sources—things other than her vlog and the organization's press release? I think we need secondary sources to show the significance of the program (as well as the significance of Mind) before this is included. —C.Fred (talk) 16:30, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done Nikthestunned 13:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

'did not write the book on her own'?

She didn't write any of it. This whole section needs re-written. --82.41.251.96 (talk) 10:21, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Please provide sources for your claims. Nikthestunned 10:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Partner?

From the documentation for {{Infobox person}} about partners: "If particularly relevant, or if the partner is notable; 'partner' here means unmarried life partners (of any gender or sexual preference), not business partner." Sugg and Deyes have been dating, but has the relationship reached the depth and duration to call them partners—and more to the point, do any secondary sources refer to them as such? —C.Fred (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

No, sources universally refer to them as "boyfriend" / "girlfriend" (or synonyms thereof) - which allows for minor inclusion in the article (given the coverage) but not the infobox (which I think basically constitutes legal partners, whether officially ratified or not). Nikthestunned 15:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

After watching many of their YouTube video's I think they are more business partners than boyfriend and girlfriend. They met at a YouTube convention you very rarely see Alfie and Zoe hold hands with each other, They never kiss each other. It's possible they don't sleep in the same bed together. They have separate bathrooms. The only people who attend their parties or have sleep overs at their house are other YouTube Vloggers that also belong to their management company. when one of them is traveling around the UK promoting their book the other one stay's home. Alfie makes video's with other women without Zoe and Zoe makes video's with other men without Alfie. And when Alfie is overseas Zoe has men staying in one of the spare bedrooms which would make an average boyfriend very upset.Mirrabooka (talk) 16:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2015

Please change this:

As of January 2015, Sugg's main YouTube channel has over 7 million subscribers and over 330 million video views, and is the 59th most subscribed channel on the website; her second channel "MoreZoella" has over 2.6 million subscribers and over 170 million video views.

To this:

As of August 23 2015, Sugg's main YouTube channel has 8.9 million subscribers and over 520 million video views, and is the 50th most subscribed channel on the website; her second channel "MoreZoella" has over 3.4 million subscribers and over 290 million video views.

Sources: http://vidstatsx.com/youtube-top-100-most-subscribed-channels https://www.youtube.com/user/zoella280390/about https://www.youtube.com/user/MoreZoella/about Mkdileep (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

 Done (for the most part) Nikthestunned 08:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 May 2016

In Zoe's "Draw My Life" video, she said she was born on March 28,1992. Right now, the page says March 28, 1990. Wikigeeknerdbang (talk) 02:29, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

 Not done read the link to this article which was used as a reference - maybe she got confused in her interview - although some people try to appear younger than they are. - Arjayay (talk) 06:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 June 2016

You should add under the Subscribers tab that she has 10 million subs on her main and on her vlogging channel 4,114,895 subs

Emmaduhon (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC) Emma Duhon

Not done: It's already there. st170e^talk 22:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

References

Semi-protected edit request on 16 October 2016

zoella has over 11 million subscribers, not 5

109.149.151.231 (talk) 19:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Not done: Already says 11 in the infobox Cannolis (talk) 19:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 December 2016

Zoe recently released her new book (Girl Online: Going Solo) on November 28th 2016 OfficialLozzy (talk) 12:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Book was already mentioned in the article; added release date and a ref (albeit a poor one). Wire723 (talk) 11:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2016

can we please change the picture to a more recent onePrincessktxox (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Princessktxox (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

The current image has been released under a free license. If you know of a more recent freely licensed replacement, you are welcome to propose the specific image. Huon (talk) 23:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 April 2017

Msier048 (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — IVORK _Discuss 00:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 10 May 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Primefac (talk) 18:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

---

Zoella → Zoe Sugg – I moved the page to this name accidentally after attempting to revert a previous move to 'Zoë Sugg', which is not, and has never been, her name. I'm pretty sure we should be using her full and real name as that seems to be widely available and often used in news articles etc. Nikthestunned 17:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose It seems like the press (Sun, Hindustan Times, Metro, Cosmo, Daily Mail) often refer to her primarily as Zoella. The Guardian referred to her primarily as Zoe Sugg and Forbes: Zoe "Zoella" Sugg, but most prefer Zoella. —A L T E R C A R I  ✍ 07:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - She is best known as Zoella, so I don't see a need to move the page. I say this as creator of the Susanna Lau article, which I every now and again think "maybe I should have done the main article under Susie Bubble." I've definitely heard of Zoella, but Zoe Sugg just made me go, "who?" I don't see a need to move the page to her "real name" as this seems a bit like identity erasure - Zoella is her public persona, the name under which she creates, which makes it seem a bit like saying "right, Stefani Germanotta, we're calling you by your real name from now on." Mabalu (talk) 11:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose. Common name. Whether it's her real name or not is irrelevant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zoella. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160306082251/http://imediamonkey.com/2013/08/30/zoella-bypasses-2-million-youtube-subscribers to http://www.imediamonkey.com/2013/08/30/zoella-bypasses-2-million-youtube-subscribers/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Umlaut

So recently, I made an edit adding an "ë" to the spelling of Sugg's birth name. This edit was reverted by @Nikthestunned:, asking me to "not add random umlauts to her name". However, as seen by her Twitter, this is just how she spells her name. Also, they added United Kingdom back into the Infobox, although I believe that I read a policy where the constituent country is supposed to be listed rather than the UK, similarly to how one is supposed to be listed as "English, Scottish, Welsh, etc" rather than "British" unless they publicly identify themselves as the latter. However, I am unable to find a policy that says so, so if somebody has knowledge on that topic please let me know. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 13:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi there. A twitter screen-name is in no way an indicator of how someone spells their name! It's just a 'cool' affectation... Or should we also change Lady Gagas name to Xoxo Gaga etc!? It doesn't mean anything and should not be used in her article at all. The other part I've just reinstated, I shouldn't have reverted both, my apologies. Nikthestunned 15:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2017

The name shall be Zoë Sugg, not Zoella, her name is Zoë not Zoella. KristofferNaley1 (talk) 22:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

 Not done The subject is referred to by her WP:COMMONNAME, Zoella, the name by which she chooses to be commonly known, and by her legal name Zoe Elizabeth Sugg. There is no evidence that she uses the diacritic above the "e" in Zoe, and there is evidence to the contrary, e.g., [1]. See other notices on this Talk page. General Ization ^Talk 22:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2017

Please change "She has been in a relationship with fellow YouTube star Alfie Deyes since 2014." to "She has been in a relationship with fellow YouTube star Alfie Deyes since 2012." because they started dating Oct 4th, 2012 based on information they have said on twitter, Instagram, and their vlogs on youtube. Amfull (talk) 12:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. SparklingPessimist ^{Scream at me!} 01:10, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2018

zoella was born 1987 185.28.91.235 (talk) 11:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

In addition, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2018

chanel name originally

zoella2803901 185.28.91.235 (talk) 11:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

In addition, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Title of article?

An editor changed the infobox name today from "Zoella" to "Zoe Sugg"; I reverted to comply with the title of the article. However, the current state of the article is not inconsistent with the editorial choices we've made in the article: all the subsequent references to the subject are to "Sugg", not "Zoella"; we seem to use the latter as references to her YouTube channel or brand.

In light of this, should the article stay at its current title of "Zoella"? Or, since the article is primarily about the person and the brand is secondary, should it be moved to "Zoe Sugg"? It would help to see how recent sources refer to her to determine how to apply WP:COMMONNAME. —C.Fred (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

I should've pinged Joesimnett when I left this message. Doing so now. —C.Fred (talk) 16:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

C.Fred I believe that the article name should be changed from Zoella to Zoe Sugg. Sugg has stated on social media and in videos that she’s going by her birth name now, and as the articke is about her as a person, rather than her brand, it should be altered. —Joesimnett (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

@Joesimnett: How are independent reliable sources referring to her now? —C.Fred (talk) 17:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

@C.Fred: Sources such as iNews, Independant, Ok, etc are beginning to use Zoe Sugg. Many others use Zoella in headlines, perhaps to draw attention, as it’s a well known pseudonym, but use Zoe Sugg within the article. —Joesimnett (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 17 September 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

---

Zoella → Zoe Sugg – Sugg now goes by her birth name, Zoe Sugg. She has publicly stated that she no longer uses the Zoella channel, and has adopted the use of her Zoe Sugg YouTube channel more. She has also changed her social media usernames to ZoeSugg. Independent sources such as Metro, Hello!, Stylist and Shemazing refer to her as Zoe Sugg, rather than Zoella. DarkGlow (talk) 15:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 16:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose per WP:TOOSOON. Wikipedia uses the WP:COMMONNAME which is not necessarily the current name. I think we need time for her birth name to become the commonname here, if it ever does. Lazz_R 19:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose for now. Articles published in the last few weeks [2][3][4] refer to her primarily as Zoella. PC78 (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

@PC78: Actually, most articles from the past few months refer to her as Zoe Sugg. See here: [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] – DarkGlow (talk) 07:45, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Hmmm, neutral then because it's not consistant in reliable sources. I can see some merit in the proposal though. PC78 (talk) 10:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose per WP:TOOSOON, Move in a year or 2 when sources start calling her by her real name. –Davey2010^Talk 14:02, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@Davey2010: If you look above your reply, you'll see several sources with her real name being used, and I'm sure I can find more if necessary. – DarkGlow (talk) 14:53, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

"Zoella" brings up 21,900 results[24] whereas "Zoe Sugg" only brings up 10,600 results[25] so therefore right now it's TOOSOON to move, As I said above It should be moved in a year or 2 when sources start using her full name. –Davey2010^Talk 15:02, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

• Support, prefer her birth name. Neutrale Person (talk) 18:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
• Support, topic consistency. I took a look at how the article is currently written, and we refer to her as "Sugg" throughout the article. Further, looking at the intro, "Zoe Sugg" is the person, and "Zoella" is a brand and (former) YouTube identity. Based on that, since the article is about Zoe Sugg the person, we should style the article title "Zoe Sugg". Obviously, "Zoella" would be retained as a redirect. —C.Fred (talk) 20:46, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
• Support If she wants to be referred by her full name, rather than her former nickname. So be it. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

• What she wants to be known as is irrelevant - Wikipedia policy trumps what BLPs want. –Davey2010^Talk 23:13, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.