Talk:Zubaida Tariq

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Galobtter in topic Requested move 12 January 2018
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zubaida Tariq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Move?

edit

Hi Samee! While you are a WP:PMR and you have moved the page from Tariq to Apa saying "per common use", have you discussed this anywhere? I disagree this move; either move it to correct form "Aapa", or better I suggest to shift it back to Tariq. Thanks! M. Billoo  20:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

M.Billoo2000 It was a simple move (not with PMR) per WP:BOLD, which encourages users to be bold when updating the encyclopedia. According to WP:UCRN, Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources. This includes usage in the sources used as references for the article. Although official, scientific, birth, original, or trademarked names are often used for article titles, the term or name most typically used in reliable sources is generally preferred. Other encyclopedias are among the sources that may be helpful in deciding what titles are in an encyclopedic register, as well as what names are most frequently used. The following reliable sources refer to her as Zubaida Apa (personally I also prefer Aapa spellings but majority of reliable sources use Apa.)

At present, Zubaida Aapa redirects here. If you still think it's a bad move or if you want to contest it, please request at WP:RM.  sami  talk 21:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


Hi Rms125a@hotmail.com! Now you moved it back, saying over redirect? I don't know what to say, but please check this section of talk page. As Samee was right, most of the RS say as "Apa", a minor of them say "Aapa", and there is nothing bad in using UCRN. Thanks! M. Billoo  13:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


I disagree with move of this article to Zubaida apa. Her name is Zubada Tariq, and article should be based on it. --Spasage (talk) 14:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 January 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: NO CONSENSUS; resultant is a move to Zubaida Tariq as the status quo (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


Zubaida TariqZubaida Apa – Per above discussion (Talk:Zubaida Tariq#Move?  samee  talk 10:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disagree. It should continue to be Zubaida Tariq. --Spasage (talk) 14:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.