This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I'm typically an inclusionist, and I don't really see the problem with having pages on each Pokemon, but with Wikipedia's current standards, it is stupid that these three have their own article. They're not any more notable than say, Snivy. Shrug-shrug (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
First off, notability is determined by coverage in third party reliable sources. The huge reception section of this article shows that. Second, I would say that Zubat is much more popular then Snivy, if popularity is your sense of notability. Blake(Talk·Edits)02:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
