Talk:Zuid-Holland West
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
A bot has notified me that this page on "West South Holland" is similar to this page: http://articles.gourt.com/en/South%20Holland
Indeed, it seems that the entire Wikipedia article on South Holland is very similar to this "gourt" page. I don't know which article was first: the "gourt" article or the "wikipedia" article. This may no longer be an issue after I've finished editing the South Holland page (which was a poorly written and poorly edited nightmare).
In any case, wrt to this specific article on West South Holland, I am simply taking information that was already in the Wikipedia article on South Holland and creating a new article using it. No violation if the South Holland article itself was OK. Schildewaert (talk) 04:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zuid-Holland West. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110728060011/http://www.zuid-holland.nl/overzicht_regios/index_regio_zh-west.htm to http://www.zuid-holland.nl/overzicht_regios/index_regio_zh-west.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)