 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Taiwan may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Seems more like an advertisement than anything else Missvain 05:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Was this copied directly from the website or the back of a box? Nevermind its obvious bias. Its plagarism
What you suggest to make it better? let's try some constructive criticism.
Unbiased Info?
editNever heard of them but we've got a vendor who wants to set us up with their routers. I'm doing some research to see just how badly they suck. Google's search results have been getting crap of late, makes it very difficult to find decent, valuable feedback. Too many sites are just link aggregators, either linking to or reprinting the content of other sites. They're trash and should be filtered out of the results. --Gmuir 15:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- "Never heard of them, they must suck" is a terrible excuse. ZyXEL is a well known brand in network hardware. --85.197.239.175 (talk) 03:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- "I'm doing some research to see just how badly they suck. Google's search results" Better expand your sources. ZyXel is a big company, reputable enough to have their equipment used by major corporations. --122.2.226.156 (talk) 11:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Seems massively biased to me... Fairly well-regarded company (I work with multitudes of modems all the time), so I think the page should stay, but heavily reworded to be more objective. 203.206.207.83 (talk) 01:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Requested move 6 May 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 06:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
ZyXEL → Zyxel – The company no longer uses the stylized ZyXEL capitalization, which, from what I can gather, was never its official name anyway. I would be bold and do this myself as it's not controversial but I'm not a registered user. 27.242.39.143 (talk) 05:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support In ictu oculi (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Strong support as their website and news section use the "Zyxel" formatting - the article also needs some work done. – TheGridExe (talk) 17:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.