Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal/sandbox
Arbitration enforcement action appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}
editProcedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved administrators" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.
To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).
- Appealing user
- Example (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – ~~~
- Sanction being appealed
- {{{Sanction being appealed}}}
- Administrator imposing the sanction
- Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Notification of that administrator
- The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.
Statement by {{{Appealing user}}}
edit{{{Reason for the appeal}}}
Statement by {{{User imposing the sanction}}}
editStatement by (involved editor 1)
editStatement by (involved editor 2)
editDiscussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}
editStatements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.
Statement by (uninvolved editor 1)
Statement by (uninvolved editor 2)
Result of the appeal by {{{Appealing user}}}
- This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.
 | This is the template sandbox page for Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal (diff). See also the companion subpage for test cases. |
Usage
editThis template may be used for appealing arbitration enforcement actions as explained in the 2010 motion in re Trusilver. To use it, please copy the text below to the appropriate forum and fill out the required fields (or proceed as per WP:AEBLOCK in the case of a block).
Note: Do not keep the angle brackets (<>) that appear below in the template. These should be replaced with the text described within them.
{{subst:Arbitration enforcement appeal
| Appealing user
= <Username>
| User imposing the sanction
= <Username>
| Sanction being appealed
= <Text>
<!-- Provide a brief description, a link to the sanctions log (if any) and to the
discussion resulting in the sanction (if any). Example:
Topic ban from the subject of Antarctica-Micronesia relations, imposed at
[[WP:AE/Archive50#Request concerning ProudPenguin]], logged at
[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Antarctica-Micronesia#Log of blocks and bans]] -->
| Reason for the appeal
= <Your text>
<!-- Please explain *why* you appeal the sanction and whether you want it to be lifted or modified. -->
}}