This template is being discussed in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Help reach a consensus at its entry.
Maintenance use only: 1. Edit the TfD log to create the discussion entry. 2. Please consider notifying the author(s) by placing {{subst:TfD notice|Book Marks2}} ~~~~ on their talk page(s). |
Error: There must be at least 5 tot rev
Case: Only 1 review
Per Book Marks, a website that aggregates critical reviews for literature from mainstream critics, the book received an overall "Positive" consensus rating based on 35 independent third-party assessments, including 35 "rave" reviews.
Case: Only 2 review
Per Book Marks, a website that aggregates critical reviews for literature from mainstream critics, the book received an overall "Positive" consensus rating based on 35 independent third-party assessments, including 20 "rave" and 15 "pan" reviews.
Case: 3 review
Per Book Marks, a website that aggregates critical reviews for literature from mainstream critics, the book received an overall "Positive" consensus rating based on 35 independent third-party assessments, including 20 "rave", 5 "positive", and 10 "pan" reviews.
Case: 4 review
Per Book Marks, a website that aggregates critical reviews for literature from mainstream critics, the book received an overall "Positive" consensus rating based on 35 independent third-party assessments, including 16 "rave", 8 "positive", 8 "mixed", and 3 "pan" reviews.
Case: implied zero
Per Book Marks, a website that aggregates critical reviews for literature from mainstream critics, the book received an overall "Positive" consensus rating based on 35 independent third-party assessments, including 25 "rave", 8 "mixed", and 2 "pan" reviews.
Case: implied zero
Per Book Marks, a website that aggregates critical reviews for literature from mainstream critics, the book received an overall "Positive" consensus rating based on 35 independent third-party assessments, including 25 "rave", 1 "positive", and 9 "mixed" reviews.
Case: implied zero
Per Book Marks, a website that aggregates critical reviews for literature from mainstream critics, the book received an overall "Positive" consensus rating based on 35 independent third-party assessments, including 25 "rave" and 10 "pan" reviews.
Case: Error #1, negative numbers
Error: All inputs must be non-negative integers.
Case: Error #2, mismatched equivalence
Error: Review counts do not sum to total.
Case: Error #3, too few review
Error: There must be at least 5 tot rev