Template:Did you know nominations/1990 Bijnor riot
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
1990 Bijnor riot
... that 1990 Bijnor riot was the most destructive riot in the wake of the demolition of Babri Masjid?Source:-Basu, Amrita (1995). "Why Local Riots Are Not Simply Local: Collective Violence and the State in Bijnor, India 1988-1993". Theory and Society. 24 (1): 35–78. ISSN 0304-2421. JSTOR 657919.
Created by Winged Blades of Godric (talk). Self-nominated at 15:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC).
Article is big enough, new enough (6 days pre-nom) and correct person credited. No copyright infringement according to the detector. Neutrally written. On the topic of the hook, it is short enough, but does not appear to be correct. The riot happened in 1990, and the destruction in 1992, so that would not be in the wake. Also although the claimed source uses the word "serious" I do not see it termed "destructive". So I am looking to see a new hook. This appears to be the 5th DYK nomination by by Winged Blades of Godric, so no QPQ is required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graeme Bartlett (talk • contribs)
- @Graeme Bartlett: - Serious over here, obviously alludes to the destructive nature. Apologies about the other point.
- Alt 2 ... that 1990 Bijnor riot was the most destructive riot in the wake of Hindu nationalist campaigns, which led to the demolition of Babri Masjid? Source:-Basu, Amrita (1995). "Why Local Riots Are Not Simply Local: Collective Violence and the State in Bijnor, India 1988-1993". Theory and Society. 24 (1): 35–78. ISSN 0304-2421. JSTOR 657919. ∯WBGconverse 08:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
OK alt2 is short enough, in article, referenced and confirmed. SO good to go with alt2. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
