Template:Did you know nominations/2018 Zürich ePrix

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

2018 Zürich ePrix

edit

Improved to Good Article status by MWright96 (talk). Nominated by Kpgjhpjm (talk) at 15:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC).

  • ☑Y Article is long enough (26,000 characters excluding tables), nominated in time (GA status on 29 November, nominated 2 December), and article is within policy.
  • ☑Y Hooks are short enough, well-cited and interesting to broad audience. FYI Kpgjhpjm the article(s) in the nomination should always be in bold, which I've done.
  • ☑Y QPQ exempt, as the nominator has 0 previous DYK nominations.
  • Overall this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
    • @Yoninah: Actually while making the nomination , the source part said that the text being supported by the source must be directly quoted . Since I wrote this in a hurry , it looks like I misplaced the quotes . I have fixed the quotes above. If there are any more issues , please tell it to me . Thanks . Kpgjhpjm 01:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • @Kpgjhpjm: The source supporting the hook should be placed in quotes under the hook, in the small section that starts with the word "Source:" and ends with the link to the source. You seem to have erased that from the template when you were filling out the nomination. We only put quotes in the hook if we are lifting text directly from the source. In this case, however, the text you are "quoting" meets WP:LIMITED, so I have removed the quotes altogether.Yoninah (talk) 11:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)