- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
2023 International Conference on Climate Resilient Pakistan
Created by M.Ashraf333 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
New, right up to date (Jan. 2023 event answering 2022 flooding), interesting - notably that so much funding could be raised in this one event, 9 billion, above the target 50% of 16.3 billion. Earwig detected mostly lengthy repeated names. QPQ seems to be a n.a. situation. So... Hooks ALT1 and ALT2 look possible, Hook 0 is accurate but less "hook-y". I would consider something like Hook1a, which avoids Hook1's "Easter egg" link piping mixing the event, which really should be visible in the prime link, with attendee numbers. Hook2 is tidy but uses an acronym (4RF) which most readers will not recognise. Nice work. SeoR (talk) 16:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hook citation checked and improved - sorry for any gaps. Alt0 was fully covered, but Alts 1 and 1a are better covered now, and Alt2 lacked the required end-of-sentence cite, now in place (it is clearly covered by the Al Jazeera report). Thanks for the prompt. SeoR (talk) 13:44, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
New, right up to date (Jan. 2023 event answering 2022 flooding), interesting - notably that so much funding could be raised in this one event, 9 billion, above the target 50% of 16.3 billion. Earwig detected mostly lengthy repeated names. QPQ seems to be a n.a. situation. So... Hooks ALT1 and ALT2 look possible, Hook 0 is accurate but less "hook-y". I would consider something like Hook1a, which avoids Hook1's "Easter egg" link piping mixing the event, which really should be visible in the prime link, with attendee numbers. Hook2 is tidy but uses an acronym (4RF) which most readers will not recognise. Nice work. SeoR (talk) 16:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)