Template:Did you know nominations/28 June 1916 Berlin strike
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
28 June 1916 Berlin strike
Karl Liebknecht
- ... that 55,000 Berlin workers went on strike on 28 June 1916 to protest the arrest and trial of anti-war campaigner Karl Liebknecht (pictured)? Source: "a sympathy strike in support of Liebknecht, protesting his arrest at an aillegal May demonstration in Berlin" from: Haimson, Leopold H.; Sapelli, Giulio (1992). Strikes, Social Conflict, and the First World War: An International Perspective. Feltrinelli Editore. p. 361. ISBN 978-88-07-99047-2. and "supported by 55,000 workers in Berlin and several thousand others in Stuttgart, Bremen, Braunschweig and Essen" from: Stibbe, Matthew (19 December 2013). Germany, 1914-1933: Politics, Society and Culture. Routledge. p. 51. ISBN 978-1-317-86654-1.
- ALT1: ... that a 28 June 1916 strike in Germany in support of imprisoned anti-war campaigner Karl Liebknecht (pictured) led to his sentence being extended? Source: "The strike, however, had a negative effect for Karl Liebknecht: on 23 August, his sentence was increased by a higher military court to four years and one month" from: O'Kane, Rosemary H. T. (20 November 2014). Rosa Luxemburg in Action: For Revolution and Democracy. Routledge. p. 89. ISBN 978-1-317-69336-9.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bethpage Energy Center
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 13:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC).
New article that was moved to mainspace on 9 November is 5,461 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Main hook is 129 characters long (ALT1 is 134); both are under 200 character max. and are interesting. Refs 6 and 7 (verifying the main hook), and 9 (verifying ALT1) are reliable sources. QPQ done. Image is free and in the public domain. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 21:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
