Template:Did you know nominations/4x4 (song)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 21:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

4x4 (song)

edit

Nelly in 2007

Created by EditorE (talk). Self nominated at 21:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC).

  • The picture should appear in the article. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 10:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
  • I think that is just complete baloney and is not a rule for DYK. But I could be wrong too 和DITOREtails 18:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Excuse me? Wikipedia:QPQ#QPQ. First five nominations were for free but as my counting goes you are required to review at least 3 articles currently (but I will recount it and update if necessary). If you are not willing to do so then I've got no choice but to reject this nomination. Other reviewers were overlooked this criteria and made a big mistake when they let your previous nominations pass without a QPQ. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 19:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • UPDATE. You made 12 nominations and zero reviews. Subtracting the first five you are 7 away of making up for this nomination. Any chance you are able to equal this tally in the near future? Lajbi Holla @ meCP 19:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • IDK. You know what, I'm considering withdrawing this nomination if I have to review DYK. 和DITOREtails 20:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • It's not that of a big deal. Here you can find help for it: Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide. Anyway it's your choice just please make sure to drop a message here about your decision so we'll know how to close this nomination. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 20:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Alright I'll guess I'll review 和DITOREtails 21:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

I think you made the right call. When you finished just upload the article names here. I added a "Reviewed" line just below your hook. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 21:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm not 100% sure (I don't know the DKY rules for that). But why not continue and give it a full review? I side with you on this one that user EagerToddler39 was too harsh by rejecting the nomination at first glimpse. I also think that the work section isn't biased as it is well sourced. So I suggest if you give it a full review it'll count here as EagerToddler39's review seems to be a rushed one. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 23:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
  • If you have any more questions on other nominations feel free to use my talk page and I help you there if I can. I don't want to confuse other editors reading this nomination with too many off topic conversation. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 23:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

For the closing editor: this nomination becomes valid and good to go as soon as the QPQ reviews reach 7. All other criteria met, article and hook neutrality & length are fine, MTV is a reliable source and verifies hook. Pic is PD-Free from FlickR. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 09:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)