- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 23:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC).
Reviewed: Arthur R. Gralla.
Have an image for this if this if need be. Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
Policy compliance:
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
 - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall:
Looks good as far as I can understand all that technical jargon. I added the image to the hook so the promoting editor can decide whether to use it or not. The hook is reasonably interesting but could benefit from some abbreviating, e.g.
... that the RAF's AMES Type 85 radar (pictured)
was considered obsolete by the time it became operational? Regards
SoWhy 20:58, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Looks good as far as I can understand all that technical jargon. I added the image to the hook so the promoting editor can decide whether to use it or not. The hook is reasonably interesting but could benefit from some abbreviating, e.g. ... that the RAF's AMES Type 85 radar (pictured) was considered obsolete by the time it became operational? Regards SoWhy 20:58, 19 January 2019 (UTC)