Template:Did you know nominations/Adventure (Atari 2600)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Adventure (Atari 2600)

(

)

... ~~that the Atari 2600 game Adventure was the first well known instance of a video game Easter egg?~~

Reviewed: Sam Pepper

Created/expanded by Torchiest (talk) and Masem (talk). Nominated by Torchiest (talk) at 14:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC).

A game is not an Easter egg. E Eng 07:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that the Atari 2600 game Adventure featured the first well known instance of a video game Easter egg?
ALT3: ... that the Atari 2600 game Adventure contained the first well known instance of a video game Easter egg?
ALT4: ... that the Atari 2600 game Adventure included the first well known instance of a video game Easter egg?

--Torchiest

Let me suggest

ALT2: ... that the Atari 2600 game Adventure concealed the first well known instance of a video game Easter egg?

E Eng 19:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Article was promoted to GA on 8 April, appears neutral, and is well referenced. Spotcheck of the most-used online sources showed no copyvio concerns. The hook fact is interesting and cited in the article to an offline source. Any of the variations ALT1-4 are fine. 97198 (talk) 11:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
As one that helped to get to GA, I think ALT 3 or 4 are the best choices. The Easter egg wasn't "featured" in the game to speak, and at that time, it's had to call it having been "concealed" as we think of Easter eggs now. "Contained" or "included" are better words here for that. --MASEM (t) 14:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
I'd prefer ALT3. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 15:36, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Several paragraphs lack any cites at all, per Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 01:13, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
@Yoninah: Every paragraph in the body has at least one citation, except for the first sentence in the reception section, which is simply summarizing the reviews that follow. Paragraphs in the lead do not require citations. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 01:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Oops, I was looking at the Atari 2600 article. Sorry about that. Restoring tick per 97198's review. Yoninah (talk) 01:22, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, thank goodness. I was really confused for a minute. Cheers. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 01:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)