Template:Did you know nominations/Agneta Matthes & Agneta Park

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (message) @ 15:29, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Agneta Matthes, Agneta Park

edit

Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 08:12, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

  • I am working on the translation, see only now that it is nominated for DYK. I suggest to describe in the hook that Agneta Park is not a park, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:40, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
  • I am done with the translation, would like to see a picture and a different hook, will think about alternatives, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

The Matthes couple

ALT1: ... that Agneta Matthes and her husband (pictured), who ran factories in Delft producing yeast, perfume and margarine, developed a workers' housing area in garden city style, Agneta Park?
I imagine the picture to be cropped a bit, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 Done Br'er Rabbit (talk) 20:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:07, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:34, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Both at this point are new enough based on time of nomination and long enough based on time of nomination. Agneta Park is fully supported by sources. Hook is neutral enough and formatted properly. QPQ done. Both articles appear neutral enough.
  • Agneta Matthes is not fully supported by sources. In Agneta Matthes, hooked fact not cited.
  • Hooked fact appears to suggest she tried to get the park named after herself. The article doesn't suggest she was behind the article naming. Can alt be proposed which avoids the suggestion she named it after herself? --LauraHale (talk) 10:07, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Referenced. I'd go with ALT1. TAP 10:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Still not fully sourced. Added fact tags for missing places.


Alt1 Hooked fact supported by sources. --LauraHale (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done. TAP 10:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)


Good to go for ALT1. --LauraHale (talk) 10:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Using that but without picture. Rcsprinter (message) @ 15:29, 25 July 2012 (UTC)