- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Amanda Villepastour
Created by Bahnfrend (talk). Self-nominated at 23:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC).
* Review in progress Going to remove the band history as they have their own article. Victuallers (talk) 21:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
* First, I'm assuming Victuallers review was withdrawn, as it has been stricken, and it has been 10 days. If I misunderstood, my apologies.
- Second - Wow! What an article! Long, well written, thorough, engaging ... I'd say it could be GA quality (with one minor quibble, below). And all written in one pass? Amazing!
- Sourcing .... ehhh .... that's the quibble. Almost all the nontrivial sources aren't about Villepastour, they're by Villepastour. Like the interview you're using for the hook - those are her own words, the interviewer isn't vouching for them. The remaining ones are blogs, a Who's Who entry (which I can't see, but suspect might be an entry of a large list; WP:RSNP calls it debatable), other database entries, and that's about it, really. I can barely see any, indepth coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the subject - maybe the Phoenix New Times article, but even that's not really about her as such. Honestly, I worry about whether this article would survive WP:AFD. Yes, this article is simultaneously in danger of being marked a WP:GA and deletion - hard to imagine, but there it is. The quality is such that I'm going to give it the benefit of the doubt in this case, but worry. I'd hate to lose this one. If you can find a good indepth independent reliable source, that would do wonders for my peace of mind. Book or newspaper or magazine article that's more than a few paragraphs about her and that she or her employer didn't write? If I missed one or two among the others, I will be very happy, as the article quality is, again, wonderful. GRuban (talk) 21:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- @GRuban: Thanks for the review. I actually drafted the article in stages, but saved it on my computer as a draft and then published it only when I was happy with the final result. As to the sources by Villepastour herself, I understand that these can be relied upon per WP:BLPSELFPUB, ie they fit the five criteria listed there. The fact that an independent website (and radio program) decided to interview her and publish its interview assists in establishing notability (profiles of people published in independent publications are often based upon similar interviews, but are set out in narrative rather than question and answer form). Similar comments apply to the Who's Who in Popular Music book. Arguably, the Afropop Worldwide publication alone is suffient to establish notability of this subject - see Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Criteria for musicians and ensembles, item 12: "Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network." (and note the following comment in the article about Afropop: "The program is distributed by Public Radio Exchange (PRX) to over a hundred radio stations in the United States. It is also heard in Europe and Africa.") Additionally, the subject is mentioned multiple times in the former bandmate's autobiography (which is neither self nor vanity published). Yes, the Phoenix newspaper article is not specifically about her, but is independent coverage specifically naming her and describing her then activities as an ethnomusicologist. The same comments apply to the other newspaper articles about the Museum. Yes, some of the other sources are potentially a problem but nevertheless appear to be completely consistent with the interview, Who's Who and bandmate book. The music websites self published by music fans are broadly equivalent to the pre-internet fanzines that used to be similarly self published and reasonably reliable. The databases are commonly used as sources for other existing articles - I checked before I published the article. You might also want to have a quick look at other existing articles about ethnomusicologists that are generally less comprehensively sourced than this article, eg Category:British ethnomusicologists. I'm happy to respond further to any further comments. Bahnfrend (talk) 01:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
* First, I'm assuming Victuallers review was withdrawn, as it has been stricken, and it has been 10 days. If I misunderstood, my apologies.