- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Amy Cure
edit- ... that 2012 Australian Olympic cyclist and elite athlete orphan Amy Cure was adopted by an Adelaide area family?
- Reviewed: Church Clothes
Created/expanded by LauraHale (talk). Self nom at 11:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Article is new enough, long enough, neutrally written, and generally supported by reliable sources. The hook is short enough. However, I find the hook confusing, especially the reference to "elite athlete orphan." I'm not sure what that means, and the phrase is not used in the article (nor is the word orphan). Cbl62 (talk) 01:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ooops. Supporting text is "She took advantage of an athlete "adoption" programme that helps elite athletes living far away from home that placed her with a local, Adelaide area family." Source describes her as an orphan saying "WE DON'T usually think of elite athletes as orphans." Hence the linking. Added wording and fixed wording to make it more clear.--LauraHale (talk) 01:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Now I understand, but now that I understand, the hook strikes me as misleadling. She was neither an "orphan," nor was she "adopted." I appreciate your good work on Australian athletes, but I don't think this hook works. Can you suggest another? Or try to persuade me I'm wrong? Cbl62 (talk) 02:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)